![]()
I finished The Sun Also Rises and began Neuromancer this afternoon, which explains a potential head-scratching post title.
I didn’t realize that the majority of The Sun Also Rises takes place in Pamplona, Spain; had I known this, I would have read it sooner. I’ve discovered that I find Hemingway a highly enjoyable read. I read In Our Times as an undergrad and a great many other of his short stories on my own, but never any of the novels before For Whom The Bell Tolls a few months back. Except the Cliff’s Notes for A Farewell to Arms in high school and, unsurprisingly, they left no lasting impression.
In college, I always felt like Hemingway had to be handled with plastic gloves because of his unflattering portrayal of women and the unspoken closeness (i.e. closeted homosexuality!) shared by macho men who hunted, skiied, and fished together while never talking about their feelings. Now I see that just because you don’t buy in to Hem’s worldview doesn’t mean his words aren’t clever, his characters flat, or his stories uninteresting.
I thoroughly enjoyed The Sun Also Rises for a number of reasons, and not least because Hemingway, like me, is fascinated by most things Spanish. And because it takes place between the wars, which I’ve mentioned before is an area of literature that greatly interests me. Put those two things together (like in For Whom the Bell Tolls) and I’m an easy sell. There’s precious little story here, as a group of people go from getting drunk in Paris to getting drunk in Pamplona and watching bullfights. There’s a lot happening under the surface, of course, but not a lot of action to speak of. That sounds like something I’d hate, but Hem makes it work, and work well. I look forward to reading it again, the next time on paper.
Neuromancer is one of the million books that always comes up in conversations just after the words “I can’t believe you haven’t read.” I’m only twenty minutes in (audio again) and I already understand why everyone loves it and it’s a sci-fi classic. It’s edgy, it’s cool, and it’s spawned a billion clones that somehow aren’t quite as edgy and cool. Maybe I’m not a complete sci-fi convert yet because I’m always expecting the “classics” to let me down. I dunno, maybe blame Ender’s Game (which underwhelmed me) or maybe it’s an internal nerd alarm with a hair-trigger. Either way, I find my knee-jerk surprise that “Hey, this is actually really good” to be very annoying, especially since I am a practitioner of the speculative.
Current Mood: Huh? | ![]()
5 Comments
I was actually introduced to the authors William Gibson and Bruce Sterling with their joint work The Difference Engine. Not politically correct, it supposes a Victorian world where Babbage’s difference engine worked and they have steam powered computing. Fascinating world building. If they didn’t invent steampunk, they certainly were my first exposure to it.
Dr. Phil
See I had the opposite reaction. I loved Ender’s Game, but was a little underwhelmed by Neuromancer. Though, I plan to re-read Neuromancer eventually and maybe I will have a different reaction (which often happens with me). I didn’t dislike it exactly, but I didn’t love it either.
…the unspoken closeness (i.e. closeted homosexuality!) shared by macho men who hunted, skiied, and fished together while never talking about their feelings.
Trent. Please. Can’t guys enjoy hanging out with each other without being gay? Are all ladies who lunch, lesbians? Can’t stamp collectors talk about their hobby together without being accused of being secret parrot fanciers?
Neuromancer is good, but Gibson was still learning when he wrote it. It’s mentioned so often because it was so innovative for the time. The second book in that series, Count Zero is a better novel.
Actually, I was just taking the piss about Hemingway. I don’t know if I had a class as an undergrad where the possibility of Hemingway’s possible homosexuality didn’t come up. Personally, I don’t buy it. I’m full in on the misogyny bit, but I do think men can have meaningful, bonding, loving relationships outside of sexual attraction.
The initial rush of Neuromancer has worn off. The opening is just so jam-packed full of stuff I’ve seen done and redone over the last twenty years, it’s nice to see that the original was so much better.
Neuromancer has an odd kind of flat spot during the first quarter of the book, just after its strong opening. It becomes directionless, or something. I tried to read it several times, and my interest died in that spot. But when I finally pushed through it, I finished the rest of the book with enjoyment, and went on to read a lot more Gibson.
One Trackback
[...] Neuromancer is an interesting book both for its strengths and weaknesses. I started the book two weeks ago and mentioned how the opening chapters really blew me away. Then, if you read the comments, you’ll see that I’m not alone in finding that the initial euphoria wore off pretty quickly. This is one case where the aggressive world-building that happens up front is so stylishly done it really did hook me and didn’t let go. Until it did. [...]