![]()
The secret to watching the United States play some good attacking soccer? Have them face a tiny Caribbean nation playing with one man down. The US whipped up on Cuba to the tune of 6-1 last night and featured some pretty decent attack play. I was really happy to see DaMarcus Beasley bang in two well-taken goals and Heath Pearce, who I have been moaning about for the last several months, had a really good game, serving in great balls from the wing.
Still, I can’t be all positive. The US started with essentially the same lineup that’s been boring us to tears since qualification began. I was excited to see Altidore, Adu, and Torres in the squad, disappointed that none of them got the start. I thought Altidore and Adu played quite well in the minutes they did get, scoring and getting an assist respectively, and Torres looks like he could be handy too. But I don’t want to draw too many conclusions as Cuba was well-beaten and exhausted at that point. My sincere hope is that these fellas don’t step off the field for the next two irrelevant games and force their way into the starting lineup for the final round of qualifiers.
![]()
I watched portions of England’s win over Kazakhstan and was fairly unimpressed. The first couple goals game off set pieces and the team looked awfully plodding until the goals finally started dropping in late in the second half. So a big scoreline, yes, but watching England reminds me a lot of the current US squad and I find myself asking this question: what happens when these teams play somebody good?
![]()
Like Spain. 3-0 against Estonia might not have been a devastating performance by the Spaniards, but they sure do look tasty all the same. Iniesta and Xavi are ridiculous in the midfield. During the Euros I said you couldn’t get the ball off them if you had a pool cue to help trip them up; I’m raising that to a shotgun. If you want to criticize (and I don’t) you could accuse them of trying to walk the ball in the net, but it’s still fun to watch, and they still won handily—away, on a rain-slicked pitch. I wish the World Cup was this summer…
![]()
The less said the better. My prediction was that it would be ugly so I watched the US national team instead. It turned out to be uglier than I ever would have dreamed. Pure awful. After the Michigan loss I said that this team tends to lose in streaks, and boy, have I been proven right.
![]()
Mad City FC won again yesterday, 5-1, and I had nothing to do with it since I wasn’t in town. I should make the next two games though and hopefully close out the season with a pair of wins.
Current Mood: Fine | ![]()
Currently Listening To – Joe Strummer & the Mescaleros – “Global A Go-Go”
8 Comments
I was at the US-Cuba game. Why Ching (who can’t finish) when you can have Altidore? And why is it that Donovan must waste the ball if he can’t get a shot on goal?
(sigh) I wish I had answers. I think it’s safe to say that Ching is a good MLS player and a below-average international. My argument is this: sure, he looks good against the likes of Cuba, Guatemala, and Trinidad, but what can he do against bigger, stronger defenders from places like Germany, Czech Republic, England… or just about any team outside CONCACAF?
Landycakes is a gutless wonder. That’s all I have to say about that particular piece of business.
The difference between Ching and Altidore was striking. When the Cubans breathed on Ching, he collapsed or fell off the ball. Altidore’s first touch saw him stiff-arm his pursuer to the ground.
http://www.colostate.edu/dept/English/programs/thebook.pdf
Since I am in Colorado I am researching MFA’s/PhD’s out this way. The above link is a document that Colorado State’s MFA graduate students put together. It is crazily and amazingly detailed in so many ways. Thought that since you were heading up UWM’s CW group funness, you might want to check it out.
Hope all is well,
Sarah
Thanks Sarah, but this looks too useful to successfully put into practice in our program. Any chance you want to come back and do my job for me?
John, I forgot to ask which of these you meant:
* The difference between Ching and Altidore was striking
* The difference between Ching and Altidore was striking (as in striking the ball)
Well, I would, but I already have a job.
Ah well.
Oh, and I bought my ski pass to Pike’s Peak today. So, umm, nope.
Oops–that was supposed to be Vail. I had Pike’s Peak on the brain because I was researching that earlier. Anyway, I bought my ski pass for Vail.